Epec's Blog | Electronics Manufacturing Solutions

It is critical for any flex circuit design to be free of errors and violations in order to get the application to market as fast as possible without unnecessary delay. To help designers avoid common IPC PCB design standards violations in rigid-flex PCBs, this blog post will discuss three of the most common IPC Association Connecting Electronics Industries design violations.

A common question in PCB development is why flex and rigid-flex PCB tooling costs more than rigid-only circuit boards. The primary reason is process complexity. Flex circuit tooling involves more fabrication steps, tighter coordination between materials, and a higher level of hands-on engineering compared to standard rigid PCBs.

In addition to fabrication complexity, flex and rigid-flex PCB designs require more engineering programs to be manually created. Many of these steps cannot be fully automated, which increases setup time and engineering labor during the tooling phase.

We find that return merchandise authorizations (RMAs) are a powerful statement of a customer’s level of dissatisfaction. RMAs can offer evidence if a manufacturing process fell short of its goal, there was a lack of communication throughout processes, or even misdiagnosed a problem. In any case, we stand behind our product and are ready to support our customer.

A cable jacket serves more than a cosmetic purpose. In many applications, it is a critical design element that affects durability, safety, regulatory compliance, environmental protection, and installation requirements.

Early on in the printed circuit board (PCB) industry, "quick turn PCB" was a very relative term. Purchase orders were faxed, confirmed with a phone call, and lead time was open for discussion. Quick turn PCBswere 7-10 days, maybe as low as 5-days for a fast PCB manufacturer. A 2-day PCB quick turn was a very rare order which designated a person to move through production from process to process, bumping every other board from the line.

Manufacturing cable assemblies used in precision medical device applications requires rigorous demands just to meet the industry standard. When dealing with these specific applications, failure is not an option. Envision applications used in a medical environment. You must limit the possibility of failure for users in the field. Even something as mundane as cable sterilization can potentially cause the cable to fail and/or cause issues for the user(s).

Hot Air Solder Leveling (HASL) has always been the main staple of PCB surface finishes. In the late 1980s, 60/40 tin-lead reflow started to phase out of processes and was replaced with Hot Air Solder Leveling. HASL finish, the long running reliable surface finish, is still used today in military, aerospace, medical, and other applications.

We’ve received cable assembly requests on a hand-drawn dinner napkin, 8x11 pieces of paper, and even old pictures. Regardless of the format, once the request is received it is drawn into a basic design which is sent to our Engineering team. We need to have the requested design in a particular format in order to be able to manufacture the request appropriately. Otherwise, our facility would not be able to understand dimensions (etc.) correctly. An official manufacturing ready design drawing would then be returned to you.

Navigating through the complex cable industry can be both difficult and time consuming. This is especially true if, for whatever reason, you have to change your cable assembly manufacturers. This blog post is intended to give you a perspective of what to expect if you find yourself in need of switching an existing cable assembly design to a new supplier.

The old saying “to the victor go the spoils” is now starting to apply in the battery supplier industry. Recently, Panasonic announced that it will no longer be supporting any new battery pack development projects that are not in the electric vehicle (EV) or solar storage space.