Why Flex and Rigid-Flex Tooling Costs More than Rigid PCBs

Written by Paul Tome - Product Manager Flex & Rigid Flex
Posted on May 17, 2017 at 9:32 AM

One question we get asked frequently is: why flex and rigid-flex tooling costs more than rigid PCBs? The answer is quite simple; flex circuit tooling is a much more complex process than standard printed circuit boards.

Flex Circuit Boards Require More Engineering

Besides the tooling process complexity, flex circuit technology also requires additional engineering programs (files) to be created. Some flex designs may also have stiffeners, pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA), Coverlays, etc. All of these specifications require additional engineering programs to be created and the majority of the process cannot be automated. This requires an engineer to manually review the flex circuit design and create these custom programs.

4-Layer Rigid PCB vs. 4-Layer Rigid-Flex Design

An example of a 4-layer rigid circuit board design may have 7-films plots which contain 4-films for the artwork, 2-films for the soldermask, and 1 film for the silkscreen. In addition, there is also an outline route file.

rigid flex printed circuit board design

Rigid-Flex Printed Circuit Board Design

 

A simple, let me repeat that a again, a simple 4-layer rigid-flex design will have the same 7-film plots mentioned above, goes beyond that with a minimum  of another 5 routing programs that need to be created.

Additional Routing Programs May Include:

  • One program to remove the rigid material from where the flex layers exist.
  • Another to remove the Pre-Preg material from the flex layers.
  • You need to create a specific unique routing program for the flex outline.
  • Need an additional routing program for the flex Coverlay.
  • Finally a program for the rigid area or the assembly array.
This example doesn’t include a rigid-flex PCB designed with stiffeners, PSAs, etc. If the example did include the items, the complexity would go well beyond what is referenced above.

Prototypes and Small Volume vs. Production Quantities

The other factor in the cost of tooling charges comes down to volume. For rigid-flex and/or flex prototypes and small volume runs, most are manufactured with laser cutting or some type of mechanical routing. This is used to create the surface mount features in the Coverlays, part outline, and if required, the outline of the stiffeners. Electrical testing on these lower volumes is typically done with a flying probe.

In volume production of flex and rigid-flex circuits, you need to switch over to steel rule dies or male/female punch and die sets. These steel rule dies are typically more expensive to create verses the laser cutting technique. The electrical test fixtures are also switched over to a hard wired test, which can be more labor intensive. Both of these factors can add an initial upfront expense, but it allows for a substantial reduction to the unit price of the part when you are dealing with higher volumes.

Conclusion

The primary reason for the more expensive tooling charges associated to a flex or rigid-flex circuit board really comes down to the amount of manually created engineering programs a specific design may have. The other reason is the volume, but in production volumes we typically see that most customers recoup the additional expense in 2000 pieces or less.


Topics: Flex & Rigid-Flex PCB's


7 Manufacturing Methods to Reduce Cost in Your Cable Assembly

Leave a Comment